Las convenciones de los expertos nutricionistas americanos ya están patrocinadas por McDonalds

Foro general ciencia, medicina, nutrición, salud pública, política

Moderador: Fisio

Avatar de Usuario
Administrador del Sitio
Mensajes: 6731
Registrado: Dom, 01 Sep 2013, 14:18

Vie, 16 May 2014, 01:50

Ya no es que tácitamente las asociaciones y guias clínicas de nutrición sean propaganda de los Ministerios de Agricultura (la campaña contra la grasa comenzó en la era Nixon para controlar la inflación y favorecer cultivos rentables en términos de kcal por hectárea de terreno de cultivo). Ya no es que los papers estén financiados por Big Food y Big Agrochemical. Ya es que las propias convenciones de los clínicos están financiadas por el paradigma de la comida dañina. Impresionante. Estamos seguros que el gran problema de lo que ocurre en Sanidad es el intrusismo? Yo creo que hay cosas bastante más dañinas de las que se habla menos.


I Went to the Nutritionists' Annual Confab. It Was Catered by McDonald's.
Our national nutrition experts are in bed with Big Food. And we wonder why we're fat.

—By Kiera Butler
| Mon May 12, 2014 6:00 AM EDT

McDonald's sponsored the annual conference of the California branch of the nutritionists' professional organization. Kiera Butler

One recent Friday afternoon, in a Mariott Hotel ballroom in Pomona, California, I watched two women skeptically evaluate their McDonald's lunches. One peered into a plastic bowl containing a salad of lettuce, bacon, chicken, cheese, and ranch dressing. The other arranged two chocolate chip cookies and a yogurt parfait on a napkin. "Eww," she said, gingerly stirring the layers of yogurt and pink strawberry goop. The woman with the salad nodded in agreement, poking at a wan chicken strip with her plastic fork.

When I asked how they were liking their lunches, both women grimaced and assured me that they "never" go to McDonald's. So why were they eating it today? Well, they didn't really have a choice. The women were registered dietitians halfway through day two of the annual conference of the California Dietetic Association (CDA). They were hoping to rack up some of the continuing education credits they needed to maintain their certification. McDonald's, the conference's featured sponsor, was the sole provider of lunch. "I guess it's good to know that they have healthier options now," said the woman with the salad.
Cheerful reps at the Hershey's booth passed out miniature cartons of chocolate and strawberry milk.

As I wandered the exhibition hall, I saw that McDonald's wasn't the only food company giving away freebies. Cheerful reps at the Hershey's booth passed out miniature cartons of chocolate and strawberry milk. Butter Buds offered packets of fake butter crystals. The California Beef Council guy gave me a pamphlet on how to lose weight by eating steak. Amy's Naturals had microwave brownies. The night before, Sizzler, California Pizza Kitchen, Boston Market, and other chain restaurants had hosted a free evening buffet for conference-goers: "Local Restaurant Samplings for Your Pleasure."

And that wasn't all. The sessions—the real meat and potatoes of the conference—had food industry sponsors as well. The Wheat Council hosted a presentation about how gluten intolerance was just a fad, not a real medical problem. The International Food Information Council—whose supporters include Coca-Cola, Hershey, Yum Brands, Kraft, and McDonald's—presented a discussion in which the panelists assured audience members that genetically modified foods were safe and environmentally sustainable. In "Bringing Affordable Healthier Food to Communities," Walmart spokespeople sang the praises of (what else?) Walmart.
McDonald's catered lunch at the conference. Kiera Butler

After lunch, I attended "Sweeteners in Schools: Keeping Science First in a Controversial Discussion." Sponsored by the Corn Refiners Association, whose members produce and sell high-fructose corn syrup, it included a panel composed of three of the trade group's representatives. The panelists bemoaned some schools' decision to remove chocolate milk from their cafeteria menus. Later, one panelist said that she'd been dismayed to learn that some schools had banned sugary treats from classroom Valentine's Day parties, which "could be a teachable moment for kids about moderation." The moderator nodded in agreement, and added, "The bottom line is that all sugars contain the same calories, so you can't say that there is one ingredient causing the obesity crisis." The claim was presented as fact, despite mounting scientific evidence that high-fructose corn syrup prompts more weight gain than other sugars.
The School Nutrition Association has asked Congress to lift the rule that students must take fruits and vegetables on the lunch line.

Later, I asked conference spokeswoman Pat Smith whether she thought it was fair to present such a one-sided discussion. She claimed that the sponsors did not influence any of the content in the program. "We like to think that our dietitians have a thought process and that we are presenting them with what is out there," she said. "They need to make their own decisions on what they have listened to and apply that to their client base."

"But it's hard to make a decision if you're only hearing one side of the story," I countered.

She told me that she hadn't known beforehand that the Corn Refiners panel would be composed entirely of its own representatives. And yet, when I asked her how the panel was chosen, she explained that it was approved by a committee. She also confirmed that the Corn Refiners had paid for the panel, but she declined to say how much. (She had previously declined me press credentials for the conference, explaining that the CDA would have its own journalists covering the event.)

With 75,000 members, the CDA's parent organization, the national Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (AND), is the world's largest professional association for nutritionists and dietitians. It accredits undergraduate and graduate programs in nutrition science and awards credentials to dietitian degree candidates who pass its exam. In Washington, its lobbying arm is active on issues including childhood obesity, Medicare, and the farm bill.

It also has strong ties to the food industry. In 2013, Michele Simon, a public health lawyer and food politics blogger, launched an investigation (PDF) into the academy's sponsorship policies. Simon found that its corporate support has increased dramatically over the past decade: In 2001, the academy listed just 10 sponsors. By 2011, there were 38, including Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Nestlé, National Cattlemen's Beef Association, Mars, and many others. Corporate contributions are its largest source of income, generating nearly 40 percent of its total revenue.

Simon also learned that in 2012, Nestlé paid $47,200 for its 2,500-square-foot display in the exhibition hall at the annual AND conference, and PepsiCo paid $38,000 for 1,600 square feet. The academy's position papers, she noted, state that its sponsors do not influence its positions on controversial issues. And yet it often takes a pro-industry stance. When New York City was considering a ban on sales of oversized sodas, for example, the academy opposed it.
"No wonder Americans are overweight and diabetic. The gatekeepers for our information about food are getting their information from junk-food companies."

AND is not the only powerful nutritionists' group with strong corporate ties. The sponsors of the School Nutrition Association's 2013 annual conference included PepsiCo, Domino's Pizza, and Sara Lee. SNA made headlines recently when it asked Congress to lift the rule that students must take fruits and vegetables on the lunch line, and to ease the rules around sodium and whole grains.

Marion Nestle, a New York University nutritionist, wrote about nutritionists and corporate sponsorships in her 2007 book, Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health. "I worry a lot about food industry co-optation of my profession," she wrote to me in an email. "Food companies are smart. They know that if they can make friends and help inform dietitians and nutritionists that the people they are supporting or helping will be reluctant to suggest eating less of their products."

Andy Bellatti, a dietitian and member of AND, recalls his shock the first time he attended the organization's national conference, in 2008. "I could get continuing education credits for literally sitting in a room and listening to Frito-Lay tell me that Sun Chips are a good way to meet my fiber needs," he says. "I thought, 'No wonder Americans are overweight and diabetic. The gatekeepers for our information about food are getting their information from junk-food companies.'"

Bellatti took photos of the displays in the exhibition hall and posted them on his blog. The post started a conversation among academy members, many of whom were outraged when they learned about the sponsorships. They worried that if word got out that dietitians' professional organization had been bought out by food corporations, the profession would lose credibility. So Bellatti and several other members founded Dietitians for Professional Integrity, consisting of academy members who want to change the sponsorship policies. They lobbied the leadership, but nothing changed—except for the rules about photography at the annual conference. The following year, when Bellatti took out his camera in the exhibition hall, he was told that photographs were prohibited.

Simon, the author of the 2013 report, found in a survey of AND members that four-fifths believed "sponsorship implies Academy endorsement of that company." Just as many said that they thought members should have a say in selecting the sponsors, and most said that they would be willing to pay higher dues in order to avoid having so many corporations represented at the annual conference.

I asked AND spokesman Tom Ryan whether the academy has any plans to review its rules for food industry sponsors. He referred me to the academy's corporate sponsorship website, which contains no suggestion of forthcoming changes. When I pressed him on it, Ryan replied, "I am not going to respond to that question."

At the CDA conference I attended, most of the dietitians I talked to said that they did not realize the sessions were sponsored by companies. "I hope they're telling us the real science," said one graduate student attendee.
At the McDonald's booth, company spokespeople told conference attendees about McDonald's healthy menu options. Kiera Butler

Toward the end of the day, I spoke to a 65-year-old retired dietitian from Orange County. She told me she'd been attending CDA's annual conferences for 30 years. Shaking her head, she said that she didn't approve of the trend of junk-food sponsors. "I guess they need the money, but this is pathetic," she said, rolling her eyes. She found the McDonald's lunch particularly deplorable. "A dietitian you'd expect to be principled," she said. "But here I feel like we're sleeping with the enemy." ... convention
Avatar de Usuario
Mensajes: 516
Registrado: Lun, 30 Sep 2013, 22:05

Vie, 16 May 2014, 10:34

Y las leyes de educación de la UE están determinadas por la UNESCO y ya sabemos quien financia la UNESCO.

Mc donalds nos enseña a comer, rockefeller, brezinsky y kissinger educan a nuestros hijos... de la industria mediatica mejor ni hablar.

Así está formada la pirámide de control y adoctrinación anti democrática ya que votes a quien votes te lo comes con patatas deluxe.
El mejor traje que puedes llevar es la desnudez.
Mensajes: 1195
Registrado: Jue, 19 Sep 2013, 13:46

Vie, 16 May 2014, 11:07

ainsss acabré deprimiendome y abriendo consultas en el respectivo hilo jaja
Avatar de Usuario
Mensajes: 516
Registrado: Lun, 30 Sep 2013, 22:05

Vie, 16 May 2014, 14:56

charlyz escribió:ainsss acabré deprimiendome y abriendo consultas en el respectivo hilo jaja
La depresión se acaba cuando das por perdido y renuncias a muchas cosas, entre ellas la creencia enque este sistema está erigido sobre buenas bases.

Con lo cual cualquier lucha que se haga desde dentro, solo lo retro alimenta y complica aún más, y ya se pierde por completo la vision de totalidad.

Pero la sensacion de opresion, injusticia impune, etc, se libera únicamente actuando positivamente en ese escenario, a sabiendas de que es injusto y opresivo, haciendo lo que uno considera no oportuno, sino actuando conscientemente y haciendo realmente lo que se quiere y lo que se debe segun nuestra propia personalidad y carácter.

Mis habilidades son entrenar, reflexionar, meditar y crear realidades habitables y en eso centro mi vida, mi acción y mi pensamiento, el resto de la realidad para mi no tiene demasiada importancia, solo la utilizo oportunamente para lograr mis propios fines. Y el sistema cuanto más opresivo se vuelve, mucho más facil de encontrar salidas y fisuras para actuar en él y hacer literalmente lo que te de la gana.

Si actuas como si nada importase, haces realmente lo que quieres.

Un truco para aprender es levantarte por la mañana y tener por mente solo una cosa, "No me importa nada, no creo en nada", tener esto en la cabeza constantemente todo el dia para hacer tus labores diarias. Solamente tienes que dejarte llevar, si tienes el animo de caminar, camina. Si quieres tumbarte, tumbate. Si no te importa nada, no le tienes miedo a nada. Si no tienes miedo eres verdaderamente libre, exista sistema o no, sea opresivo o no, lo unico que hace poderoso al sistema es el miedo que genera, y cada dia lo genera en un marco nuevo para anular al individuo y que no sepa ni por donde salir.

Con el tiempo podras ir haciendolo más dias hasta que te equilibres y solo creas con todo tu corazón a ese impulso interno que nos lleva hacia las cosas que realmente queremos hacer.

un saludo.
El mejor traje que puedes llevar es la desnudez.
Mensajes: 2422
Registrado: Mar, 11 Feb 2014, 00:42

Vie, 16 May 2014, 16:12

La financiación no tiene por qué balancear los resultados de un estudio hacia un lado u otro bla bla bla... harto estoy de que ciertos doctores de mi universidad digan eso como loros y encima se lo crean. Puah.
Avatar de Usuario
Mensajes: 516
Registrado: Lun, 30 Sep 2013, 22:05

Vie, 16 May 2014, 20:23

ZeRaTuL escribió:La financiación no tiene por qué balancear los resultados de un estudio hacia un lado u otro bla bla bla... harto estoy de que ciertos doctores de mi universidad digan eso como loros y encima se lo crean. Puah.
Cierto, pero almenos como consecuencia y no como causa de este mal, a ese congreso deberia ir algún cocinero rural vasco o manchego de los que cocinan comida de verdad.

Pero eso seria un patrocinador en un mundo sin ignorancia, en un mundo ignorante pues es Mc Donalds porque patrocinar implica capital, y solo lo masificado industrialmente puede acumular mucho capital.

Osea que es totalmente lógico que sea Mc Donalds y no otros quienes patrocinen eso, asi como Rockefeller y Kissinger patrocinen nuestras leyes de educación, en ambos casos no es culpa de nadie solo de nuestra ignorancia.

Se come y se educa en casa, de toda la vida.
El mejor traje que puedes llevar es la desnudez.