FORO MUSCLEBLOG! Ciencia, noticias…

Guest  

Welcome Guest, posting in this forum requires registration.

Pages: [1]
Topic: El entrenamiento imaginado aumenta la fuerza
fisio
Administrator
Posts: 52
El entrenamiento imaginado aumenta la fuerza
on: September 27, 2010, 02:48

Effects of imagery motor training on torque production of ankle plantar flexor muscles.


Department of Medical Physiology, University of Groningen, A Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.


The aim of this study was to investigate in control subjects the effect of imagery training on the torque of plantar-flexor muscles of the ankle. Twenty-nine subjects were allocated to one of three groups that performed either imagery training, low-intensity strength training, or no training (only measurements). The low-intensity training served as an attention control group. Plantar-flexor torques were measured before, during, directly after, and 4 weeks after the training period. At the end of a 7-week training program, significant differences were observed between the maximal voluntary torque production of the imagery training group (136.3 +/- 21.8% of pretraining torque) vs. the low-intensity training group (112.9 +/- 29.0%; P < 0.02) and the control group (113.6 +/- 19.2%; P < 0.02). The results of this study show that imagery training of lower leg muscles significantly increased voluntary torque production of the ankle plantar-flexor muscles and that the force increase was not due to nonspecific motivational effects. Such muscle strengthening effects might be beneficial in rehabilitation for improving or maintaining muscle torque after immobilization.


fisio
Administrator
Posts: 52
Re: El entrenamiento imaginado aumenta la fuerza
on: September 27, 2010, 02:49

Effects of real and imagined training on voluntary muscle activation during maximal isometric contractions.


Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, University of New South Wales, Australia.


In this study we directly tested the hypothesis that isometric strength training increases voluntary drive to muscles. In addition, it was attempted to replicate the findings of an earlier study that showed imagined training increases voluntary strength as much as actual training, as this finding provides key support for the hypothesis that training increases voluntary drive (Yue & Cole 1992). Fifty-four subjects were randomly allocated to groups that performed 8 weeks of isometric training of the elbow flexor muscles, imagined isometric training, or a control task involving the lower limbs. Voluntary isometric strength and activation of the elbow flexor muscles were measured before and after training. Voluntary activation was measured with a sensitive form of twitch interpolation. Training, imagined training and control groups increased voluntary isometric elbow flexor strength by means of 17.8% (+/- 3.1 SEM), 6.8% (+/- 2.6) and 6.5% (+/- 3.0), respectively. The training group increased in strength significantly more than imagined training and control groups (P = 0.01 for both comparisons), but the small difference between imagined training and control groups was not significant (P = 0.31). Prior to training, voluntary activation of all subjects was high (96.2 +/- 0.5%). This did not change significantly with training and there were no significant differences between groups. These data challenge the hypothesis that training of the elbow flexor muscles increases isometric strength by inducing adaptations of the central nervous system, because they show that training does not increase voluntary activation and imagined training does not increase strength.


fisio
Administrator
Posts: 52
Re: El entrenamiento imaginado aumenta la fuerza
on: September 27, 2010, 02:50

Strength increases from the motor program: comparison of training with maximal voluntary and imagined muscle contractions.


Department of Exercise Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.


1. This study addressed potential neural mechanisms of the strength increase that occur before muscle hypertrophy. In particular we examined whether such strength increases may result from training-induced changes in voluntary motor programs. We compared the maximal voluntary force production after a training program of repetitive maximal isometric muscle contractions with force output after a training program that did not involve repetitive activation of muscle; that is, after mental training. 2. Subjects trained their left hypothenar muscles for 4 wk, five sessions per week. One group produced repeated maximal isometric contractions of the abductor muscles of the fifth digit’s metacarpophalangeal joint. A second group imagined producing these same, effortful isometric contractions. A third group did not train their fifth digit. Maximal abduction force, flexion/extension force and electrically evoked twitch force (abduction) of the fifth digit were measured along with maximal integrated electromyograms (EMG) of the hypothenar muscles from both hands before and after training. 3. Average abduction force of the left fifth digit increased 22% for the Imagining group and 30% for the Contraction group. The mean increase for the Control group was 3.7%. 4. The maximal abduction force of the right (untrained) fifth digit increased significantly in both the Imagining and Contraction groups after training (10 and 14%, respectively), but not in the Control group (2.3%). These results are consistent with previous studies of training effects on contralateral limbs. 5. The abduction twitch force evoked by supramaximal electrical stimulations of the ulnar nerve was unchanged in all three groups after training, consistent with an absence of muscle hypertrophy. The maximal force of the left great toe extensors for individual subjects remained unchanged after training, which argues against strength increases due to general increases in effort level. 6. Increases in abduction and flexion forces of the fifth digit were poorly correlated in subjects of both training groups. The fifth finger abduction force and the hypothenar integrated EMG increases were not well correlated in these subjects either. Together these results indicate that training-induced changes of synergist and antagonist muscle activation patterns may have contributed to force increases in some of the subjects. 7. Strength increases can be achieved without repeated muscle activation. These force gains appear to result from practice effects on central motor programming/planning. The results of these experiments add to existing evidence for the neural origin of strength increases that occur before muscle hypertrophy.


Pages: [1]
WP Forum Server by VastHTML | LucidCrew
Version: 1.6.2 ; Page loaded in: 0.028 seconds.

© 2010 muscleblog Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha